We are a nation of optimists. We are mostly religious in nature in some form, hence are optimist about the existence of god. We vote in huge numbers and hence are optimist about good intentions of politicians. We also drive on the opposite lane, without helmets, while talking in a cellphone with our neck bent, optimistically, because accidents happen only to others. So when India increased the traffic violation fines manifold, the optimism got a rude awakening. With newspapers now reporting regular instances of record breaking fines (sometimes exceeding the resale value of the vehicle itself), the propriety of the quantum of punishment is now being questioned. That brings me to ask an existential question, by the logic of common law, why the world drives in opposite directions at all? And what connects politics and traffic rules like conjoint twins at hips?
Left is right?
Actually might is right. The custom of driving (or riding actually) on the left side was devised by the British to ensure that your fighting arm (which was right in most case) was free and directed towards the approaching rider from the opposite side. This was to, you know, prevention against road rage circa 1600s.No wonder, statistically, left handed knights had a very short lifespan. Thankfully we Delhites are much civilized these days and don’t dangle baseball bats from the windows and hit the passing car, we get down and shoot each other instead. Convenient.
What about the right ones then?
French Connection (not UK) has to be that. The French had to do the opposite of Brits, so the aristocrats boggy-men typically chose the right side of the road. But come French Revolution, and the spillover of the driving sides literally descended upon the parliament as well. The common peasantry occupied the left side of the hall, while the aristocrats seated on the right. And just by happenstance we get our “left wing” and “right wing” politics and worldview.
Understood, but are you fine with the fine?
It couldn’t have come at a batter (typo intended) time indeed! With passenger vehicle sales sliding down to a 19 year low figures and abysmal stress in the rural economy – the well intention-ed “tax the truants” scheme seems to be backfiring. With people shifting to public transportation in cities to avoid fines in excess of ~5% don’t expect a bumper festive sale season. Add to it the reluctance of rural transporters to carry on business in face of heavy fines – thus causing more harm to the rural economy, we might be flogging the wrong block here.
So where do we head from here?
The knee jerk reaction to the business of fine seems to be of mass terror, while this should have been directed only at the minority who violate and cause damage. Media plays a huge role in creating a narrative over here and I believe they are not playing the part well enough. The focus has shifted to the quantum of punishment for commercial reasons – instead it should be on the gravity of the violations and public damage.
Is punishment really going overboard on crime here?
Really? Then you need to watch A Twelve year night currently on Netflix, just to appreciate what judicial overreach actually means. Its also a hard lesson on human endurance and an eye opener on the importance of mental health – which I think is a separate days topic.
Disclaimer: All views strictly personal, based on public information.